90. Less “having”, more “being”. A small mindset hack for more happiness!

To Have or To Be: A Mindset Hack for More Happiness

Having or being: why wanting to own more can feel different from learning, growing and becoming the person you want to be.



Reza Mehman, host of this podcast episode about having or being

A change in perspective in everyday life

Having or being is far more than a philosophical question: it’s a mindset hack that enables true happiness. In this episode of Project Mindset, Reza Mehman takes us on a journey of thought that begins with a visit to the Heidelberg City Archives with rapper Torch and ends with the core question of Erich Fromm’s classic “To Have or To Be.” Why does wanting to have more inevitably lead to less pleasure? And what happens when we try to be more instead? Using concrete examples from university, the gym, and family life, Reza shows how this small linguistic difference affects our entire way of thinking. A shift in perspective that can be applied immediately in everyday life and leads to greater satisfaction in the long run.


Having or being: the episode in brief

In one sentence: Those who stop wanting to own things and instead start being something find true and lasting satisfaction.

In three sentences: Reza Mehman reflects on the difference between “having” and “being,” inspired by a meeting with rapper Torch and Erich Fromm’s book “To Have or To Be.” Using everyday examples, he demonstrates that focusing on possessions brings only short-term pleasure, while “being” leads to deeper fulfillment. The key lies in a conscious shift in language and a changed mindset that prioritizes experience and identity over accumulation.

In five sentences: In this episode, Reza Mehman recounts a visit to the Heidelberg city archives, where rapper Torch keeps his collection of hip-hop memorabilia. Although Torch loves his collection, losing it wouldn’t devastate him because he maintains a healthy emotional distance from his possessions. Reza connects this experience to Erich Fromm’s book “To Have or To Be,” which describes how the constant desire to possess only produces short-term pleasure. Reza illustrates the difference with examples from his studies, the gym, and his role as a father. The central message: Rephrasing “I want to have two children” to “I want to be a father of two children” changes not only your language but your entire mindset.


Context: Who, What, Why

Who is speaking: Reza Mehman, host of the podcast Project Mindset, shares his personal reflections and experiences.

What is it about: To explore the philosophical and everyday practical difference between the mode of “having” (possession, accumulation, consumption) and the mode of “being” (experience, understanding, identity), inspired by a meeting with rapper Torch and the work of Erich Fromm.

Why is this relevant? In a consumer-oriented society that constantly strives to “have more”, the shift in perspective to “being” offers a concrete path to more sustainable satisfaction and a more fulfilling life.

Three key questions of the episode:

  • Why does the ever-increasing “wanting” lead to ever less genuine pleasure?
  • How does a change in language from “having” to “being” change our mindset in everyday life?
  • Is it possible to own things and still remain emotionally free from them?

Table of contents

  1. Introduction – Why Having or Being is a real mindset hack
  2. Summary – The episode in one, three, and five sentences
  3. context – Background information on speaker, topic and relevance
  4. Table of contents – Overview of all sections
  5. Topics and classification – The central themes of the episode
  6. Key messages – The most important messages at a glance
  7. Frequently Asked Questions – Answers about having, being, and happiness
  8. Highlight quotes – The most striking statements of the episode
  9. Transcript – Full transcript of the episode
  10. Keywords – SEO-relevant keywords
  11. Names and terms – Important people, places and concepts
  12. Quotable passage – For sharing and quoting

Topics and classification

1. Having vs. Being: Erich Fromm’s Philosophy in Everyday Life

Reza breaks down the complex theory from “To Have or To Be” into everyday examples and shows how the mode of having differs from the mode of being.

Keywords: Erich Fromm, To Have or To Be, Consumerism Criticism

2. Emotional distance to possessions

The example of rapper Torch clearly shows that one can appreciate things and let go of them at the same time without being broken by it.

Keywords: Letting go, emotional distance, possessions and happiness

3. Language as a reflection of mindset

The shift from “I want to have something” to “I want to be something” changes not only words, but the entire inner attitude.

Keywords: Language shift, mindset shift, conscious language

4. Learning and Knowledge: Collecting vs. Understanding

The difference is particularly evident in university studies: taking notes is “having”, truly understanding a topic is “being”.

Keywords: Learning strategies, understanding vs. memorization, university studies

5. Identity and Lifestyle: Being instead of seeming

Whether in the gym or playing basketball: Those who truly “are” don’t need equipment to prove it.

Keywords: Authentizitaet, Identitaet, Lifestyle vs. Substanz


Key messages

  • Wanting to have more and more inevitably leads to less and less genuine enjoyment.
  • The difference between “I want to have two children” and “I want to be a father of two children” is small in language, but huge in mindset.
  • Torch has been collecting hip-hop artifacts for decades, but would remain calm if everything were lost.
  • Emotional distance from possessions is not a contradiction to appreciating things.
  • In university studies, there is a clear difference between collecting documents (having) and truly understanding a subject (being).
  • People who truly “are” something (e.g., weightlifters or basketball players) need less external equipment than those who just want to “have” it.
  • Erich Fromm’s book “To Have or To Be” is complex, but a worthwhile read for anyone who wants to delve deeper into this topic.
  • Conscious language is a first step to shifting one’s mindset from the having mode to the being mode.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does “To Have or To Be” mean according to Erich Fromm?

Erich Fromm distinguishes between two fundamental modes of existence: the mode of “having,” in which people define themselves through possessions and accumulation, and the mode of “being,” which is about experiencing, understanding, and authentic identity. Fromm argues that the having mode brings only short-term pleasure, while the being mode leads to deeper satisfaction.

How can one implement the mindset shift from having to being in everyday life?

A first step is to pay attention to your own language. Instead of “I want to have a job,” you can say: “I want to be good at my job.” This conscious change in language alters your inner attitude and shifts the focus from possession to experience and identity.

Why doesn’t more possessions automatically lead to more happiness?

Possessions create a short-term high that quickly fades, triggering a desire for more. This pattern leads to an endless cycle of wanting without ever achieving lasting satisfaction. True happiness arises more from experiences, relationships, and personal growth.

Who is Torch and what does he have to do with this topic?

Torch, whose real name is Frederik Hahn, is one of the pioneers of German rap from Heidelberg. In this episode, his approach to his hip-hop collection serves as an example: He values ​​his artifacts but could also let them go if they were lost. This demonstrates a healthy balance between appreciation and emotional distance from possessions.

What is the difference between “having children” and “being a father”?

According to Reza Mehman, “I want to have two children” reflects a rather egocentric attitude, while “I want to be a father of two children” expresses responsibility, care, and an active role. The linguistic difference is subtle, but it reflects a fundamentally different mindset.

Is the book “To Have or To Be” easy to read?

Reza Mehman describes the book as recommendable, but complex. It is not as easily accessible as, for example, “The Cafe at the Edge of the World” and requires multiple readings to fully grasp its core ideas.

How does the difference between having and being manifest itself in the gym?

Reza observes two types of weightlifters: Some have the complete equipment, including special shoes, belt, and chalk, but only lift medium weights. Others arrive in normal sportswear, lift heavy weights, and leave again. The second group “is” a weightlifter, while the first group “has” the lifestyle.

Is it possible to own things and still live in the “being” mode?

Yes, Torch’s example illustrates this perfectly. You can appreciate and collect things without becoming emotionally attached to them. The crucial point is whether possessions define your identity or whether you can find peace within yourself even without them.


Highlight quotes

“I find it interesting that on the one hand you want to have something, but then you can also build up an emotional distance to it, so that when it’s no longer there, that’s an okay union.”

– Reza Mehman

“I would like to have two children. But I think there’s a huge difference between saying: I would like to be a father to two children.”

– Reza Mehman

“That’s a very small difference in language. But I think in terms of mindset, it’s a huge difference.”

– Reza Mehman

“What happens if everything is suddenly lost? He actually thought about it briefly and said: He doesn’t really care. That’s just how it is.”

– Reza Mehman on Torch

“This wanting to have leads to short-term pleasure, while this being, this being something, contributes more to one’s own happiness.”

– Reza Mehman

“There were subjects where I really wanted to understand the topic. It wasn’t so important whether I had all my notes together. I just wanted to understand the topic and absorbed it more.”

– Reza Mehman

“At the time, he didn’t even know why he was doing it, but he knew that one day it might somehow have some value for him.”

– Reza Mehman on Torch


The full conversation

Hi everyone and welcome to Project Mindset, the channel for all those who know that with the right mindset, anything is possible. Today I have a relatively complex Project Mindset episode for you. Complex because I don’t think I’ve quite grasped the topic 100% yet. But I’d like to share my thoughts with you today. Here’s what it’s about: I once did a Project Mindset episode with the Heidelberg musician and rapper Torch. That’s actually one of my favorite episodes.

I find him incredibly interesting. This person, Torch, whose real name is Frederik Hahn, and we even met up again after the podcast. He’s working with the city of Heidelberg to build a kind of hip-hop archive. As one of the earliest German rappers, he has been around for a long time. He had a significant impact on hip-hop, or rather rap in German, in its early years. And Heidelberg wants to work with him to create an archive that documents and preserves the early days of rap.

And we also met up at this city archive. We wanted to catch up, sort of recap the podcast we’d done together. And in this city archive, there was an archivist, and everything looked exactly as you’d imagine. Dark corridors, high ceilings, a kind of climate control system with appropriate humidity and so on, so that the materials wouldn’t get damaged. And in this archive, Torch had a little corner for all his materials.

Hip-hop history in the Heidelberg City Archives

There were all sorts of things there, like old posters, for example, that were actually printed sometime in the 90s. You can see that everything is a bit older, it had a kind of patina. There were also various texts he had written on school backpacks. The backpack itself, an old Scout backpack of his, for example. You might remember those boxy school backpacks from back then. There were all sorts of little things there, things he simply used, skateboards and so on.

That was all with Dors, and it was really interesting to see the whole thing. They also plan exhibitions like this in other cities from time to time, so everything gets transported from A to B. And on the day I was there, I think they were actually planning to transport something to Pforzheim. So there was a lot of excitement about how everything would be packed, moved back and forth, and so on. You could tell everyone was handling things very carefully. Torch even showed me one of his old records.

I think he was particularly proud of that. There was a big poster in it, too. And he told me that this poster might not sound so interesting or elaborate or whatever today. But back then there weren’t any online printing services where you could just quickly print a huge, high-quality poster. It really took some work to get a poster like that. And it was actually a limited edition of that record.

Rediscovering your own album

And he bought his own album back from someone he happened to meet. At a good price, because it included a poster of himself, of which he knew he’d only printed 50 or so. It’s quite funny when you release your own album, your own record, and then a year later you have to buy it back somehow. But he said it was important to him to own it again. And that act of ownership kind of triggered something in me.

I also asked him, “Hey, how important are these things you have to you now? Why did you even start archiving things like that for yourself?” I mean, an old Scout backpack or shoe bag or an old skateboard, posters, and so on. He said he started collecting things very early on. At the time, he did not know why he was doing it. He began collecting things very early and kept them for himself. He didn’t know why he was doing it back then, but he knew that one day it might have some kind of value for him.

Appreciate possessions and still be able to let go

I asked him, “So, how important is all this to you?” And he said it’s incredibly important to him. He really likes these things. He had to think long and hard about working on this city archive, handing over the materials, and so on. But now he’s finally decided to do it. Then I asked him, “So, what happens if everything suddenly gets lost?” Like, for example, they’re transporting something from point A to point B, and for some reason, it all disappears.

Continued

He actually thought about it briefly and said he didn’t really care. It just is what it is. I personally thought that was amazing. His indifference felt entirely believable to me. I find it interesting that on the one hand you want something, but then you can also develop such an emotional distance from it that if it’s no longer there, it’s still an okay club. That immediately reminded me of Erich Fromm’s book “To Have or To Be.”

This is a very interesting, but also very complex book. I actually have to read bits and pieces of it quite often to understand the overall message. So, I would definitely recommend taking a look. Perhaps with a small warning: it’s not as easy to read as “The Coffee at the Edge of the World.” We’ve talked about that a few times here on the podcast. It’s actually a bit more complex. Here’s a brief summary.

The book is about how wanting to possess leads to short-term pleasure, while being—that is, actually being—contributes more to one’s own happiness. It would be really complex to summarize the whole book here. But roughly speaking, for me it’s about having versus being. After reading the book, I also examined my own wording. I looked at how I use language in general, specifically whether I tend to be in the “having” mode or the “being” mode.

Considering one’s own language about wishes

And actually, I’ve noticed that I often talk about it, or rather, I used to talk about it a lot, wanting to have something. My goals were clear: a degree and a job. I wanted us to move forward, and ultimately, something that really opened my eyes. Even at the point where I said, okay, I want to have two children. But I think there’s a huge difference between saying, to stick with this example, “I want to have two children,” and saying, “I want to be a father to two children.”

That’s a very small difference, but only in language. I mean, in language. But I think in terms of mindset, it’s a huge difference. If I say, “I want a father of,” or “I want to have two children,” it already sounds quite egocentric, selfish to me, just in the way I pronounce it. “I want to have.” But if I say, “I am,” or “I want to be a father of two children,” then a bit of altruism comes through. Being a father also means having certain tasks, obligations, to take care of the children and so on.

How Having and Being Change Thinking

And here in the language, you can already hear the difference between “to have” and “to be.” So feel free to read this book. If you have any feedback on the book, please write to me. I’m also interested in your perspective, of course, how you think about it. But I wanted to mentally compare these two topics between what Torch said and what’s in this book. I also wanted to summarize them for myself and consider where I typically encounter this “to have” versus “to be” dichotomy.

I noticed it even back in my university days. There were moments, there were subjects, where I felt like I was just collecting a lot of material. I wanted the information, I wanted the notes, the documents, and so on. But it wasn’t really about understanding what was actually being said. I just wanted to collect the stuff. I wanted to have it and then pass the exam. Then there were other subjects where it wasn’t about collecting all the surrounding material at all; I actually wanted to understand the topic.

It wasn’t really important whether I had all the notes, all the documents from my fellow students, and so on. What I wanted to do was understand the subject matter, so I absorbed what was happening. Without taking lots of notes, I just wanted to understand what we were actually talking about. That’s something I’ve remembered very well from back then. I’d say most subjects were more like, “Okay, I’ll just cram this in somehow, get the notes, make copies of books, and so on.”

Studying for the exam or truly understanding

But there were actually one or two subjects that were really interesting to me. I really wanted to understand what was going on because I knew it wasn’t just about the exam, but about something long-term. That’s a small example for me where this “having versus being” thing comes into play. Another example is more of a funny one. At the gym where I train, there are also two types of, let’s say, weightlifters. People who have a barbell and then do deadlifts or something similar with the barbell.

Continued

And this one type of weightlifter always wears those weightlifting shoes. They have weightlifting belts with chalk and so on and so forth. With all their equipment, they lift a fair amount of weight, but not too much. They also take an incredibly long time. It bothers me because I want to use those machines too, but I can’t, because I know that when I see them wearing those weightlifting shoes, they’re going to spend another hour messing around with them.

Then I think to myself, okay, today I won’t do barbell training on the floor, but something else. Then there are people who don’t have any of that. They just wear normal workout clothes and show up. They then really press or lift a lot of weight, warm up briefly, and lift a lot of weight. You can tell they’re really strong. They’re only on the equipment for a relatively short time and then they just leave again. Now, the question is, of course, what about those who have a ton of equipment, they have this lifestyle, the shoes, the T-shirts that say they’re a weightlifter, and so on and so forth?

An observation in the gym

Is he a weightlifter, or is it someone who comes in, can actually lift weights, and then just leaves again, but doesn’t have that weightlifter lifestyle? Yeah, I know it’s strange to observe that kind of thing at the gym, but I actually do. I look at people, and I think you can tell pretty quickly, and I notice it in other areas too. I play basketball on the side, and there are also people there who have all the gear, from the latest basketball shoes to headbands and who knows what else.

They typically don’t play as well as people who just wear normal clothes, correct me if I’m wrong, but you can tell they love the sport. They’ve been doing it for what feels like 100 years, and these are basketball players. For me, that’s a classic example of having versus being. Some want the lifestyle, they want the equipment, others just want to play the sport, they just want to be it, so to speak.

For me personally, it’s perfectly clear that people who want to be something, who actually are something in the moment, focus on the thing itself and don’t pay attention to everything else. I’m 100% sure of that; I notice it in myself. When I’m focused on the specific thing in front of me, I’m definitely happier than when I’m thinking, “Okay, do I have the right lifestyle, do I have the right shoes, do I have the right look?” and so on and so forth.

Practicing changing perspectives in everyday life

Do I have all of this planned out versus simply doing what’s important to me in the moment? Look, I think this topic is complex. It’s also because, if you take a look at Erich Romm’s book “To Have and To Be,” it delves into this very deeply. He says, for example, that if you’re even taking notes, then you want to have those notes in the moment. And if you simply want to be, then you allow something to become a commitment. That means you don’t even write on your notes.

So, I think it can get very complex. I only have a smattering of understanding for myself, but not a complete grasp. Clarifying things for myself through language is an ongoing effort. I also keep falling back into old patterns. I notice it myself, saying things like, “I want that.” But then I also tell myself, for example, when I realize, “Hey, okay, this is the example of being a father of two again.” I want to have children, or I want to be a father. That makes a huge difference for me in terms of language and also in terms of mindset, how I then approach these topics.

Alright everyone, that’s it for today. I hope you enjoyed the podcast episode. If so, please give it a like, because that’s the only way Project Mindset can continue to grow. I say this every time. Your continued support means a great deal to me. I’ll talk again next week. Until then, remember, mindset is everything.

Note regarding the transcript

This transcript was automatically generated using Whisper AI and may contain occasional errors.


Keywords

Tags: To Have or To Be, Erich Fromm, Mindset Hack, Happiness, Possessions and Happiness, Letting Go, Being Instead of Having, Project Mindset, Reza Mehman, Torch Rapper, Consumerism Criticism, Satisfaction, Mindset Language Shift, Personal Development, Self-Reflection


Names and terms

Reza Mehman, Project Mindset, Torch (Frederik Hahn), Erich Fromm, “To Have or To Be” (book), “The Cafe at the Edge of the World” (book), Heidelberg, Heidelberg City Archives, Hip-Hop Archive, Pforzheim, Scout (schoolbag), Magnesia, barbell, deadlift, altruism, egocentrism, limited edition, vinyl record, weightlifting, basketball


Quotable passage

“Wanting more and more inevitably leads to less and less genuine pleasure.”
“The difference between ‘I want to have two children’ and ‘ I want to be a father of two children’ is small in terms of language, but huge in terms of mindset.”
“Those who are truly someone don’t need equipment to prove it.”
“Conscious language is the first step to shifting one’s mindset from the ‘having’ mode to the ‘being’ mode.”






You can find more thoughts on satisfaction and personal development at Project Mindset.

Prefer listening? Explore the original Project Mindset podcast recordings.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *