Destructive feedback: How to deal with it confidently
The three-step strategy against unfair criticism that is meant to throw you off track, and why composure is your best weapon.

Introduction
Destructive feedback is far more common in our professional and personal lives than we’d like. Instead of helping us grow, it aims to unsettle us, belittle us, or diminish our perceived performance. In this episode of Project Mindset, Reza Mehman analyzes a specific example from the TV show “Markus Lanz” and shares his personal three-step strategy for confidently handling destructive criticism. Whether in meetings, relationships, or among friends, understanding why people criticize destructively allows you to react more calmly and regain control of the conversation. Reza uses his own experiences to demonstrate the power of transparency, composure, and a targeted counter-offensive. This episode is essential viewing for anyone who no longer wants to be derailed by unfair criticism.
Summary
In one sentence: The best way to expose destructive feedback is with composure, transparency, and a confident counter-offensive.
Short summary: Destructive feedback aims to belittle the performance of others instead of contributing constructively to the conversation. Reza Mehman recommends a three-step strategy: calmly assess the situation, be open and transparent about your own story, and confidently ask counter-questions if necessary. Crucially, you should recognize the person behind the criticism as replaceable and not let yourself be emotionally thrown off balance.
Detailed summary: Destructive feedback isn’t genuine criticism; it often serves self-promotion or the belittling of others. Reza Mehman uses a scene between Frank Thelen and Ulrike Herrmann on Markus Lanz’s talk show as an example of what such attacks can look like. His three-step strategy begins with the calm realization that there will always be such people at regular intervals. In the second step, he recommends speaking openly and transparently about past mistakes and questioning their relevance to the current situation. If the attacks continue, he advises a confident counter-offensive, clearly outlining one’s own achievements and challenging the critic’s competence.
Context: Who, What, Why
Who is speaking: Reza Mehman, host of the Project Mindset podcast, entrepreneur and mindset coach, who reports from his own experience as a founder and employee.
What is it about: This article addresses the practical handling of destructive feedback that is not aimed at improvement but rather at putting someone down. It was prompted by a scene on Markus Lanz’s talk show between Frank Thelen and Ulrike Herrmann, as well as personal experiences of Reza and those around him.
Why is this relevant? Destructive criticism can severely damage self-confidence and hinder careers. Those who have a clear strategy remain capable of acting and in control, whether in their professional lives, relationships, or public appearances.
Three key questions of the episode:
- How does destructive feedback differ from constructive criticism?
- What mindset strategy helps to remain calm in such moments?
- How do you launch a confident counter-offensive without becoming destructive yourself?
Table of contents
- Introduction – Why destructive feedback is an underestimated problem
- Summary – The episode in brief
- context – Who is speaking and why the topic matters
- Topics and classification – Overview of the main topics
- Key messages – The most important messages of the episode
- Frequently Asked Questions – Answers to questions about destructive feedback
- Highlight quotes – The strongest statements verbatim
- Transcript – Full transcript of the episode
- Keywords – SEO tags and keywords
- Names and terms – Important people and technical terms
- quotable passage – For sharing and quoting
Topics and classification
1. Recognizing destructive feedback
Not all criticism is constructive. Destructive feedback aims to belittle someone, diminish their achievements, or establish a moral superiority over others.
Keywords: destructive feedback, unfair criticism, belittling
2. Serenity as a mindset tool
The first step in dealing with attacks is inner calm. The realization that there are always interchangeable people criticizing takes the emotional edge off the situation.
Keywords: Serenity, mindset strategy, emotional control
3. Transparency and openness
Those who openly talk about their own mistakes and past experiences take the wind out of the attacker’s sails and shift the conversation to a factual level.
Keywords: Transparency, culture of learning from mistakes, open communication
4. Confident counter-offensive
If the destructive criticism persists, a clear counter-offensive is appropriate: highlight one’s own achievements and question the critic’s competence.
Keywords: Self-confidence, counter-offensive, asking counter-questions
5. Correctly interpreting feedback in everyday life
Even destructive feedback can contain a grain of truth. After the initial shock, it’s worthwhile to reflect on whether there might be a valuable clue hidden beneath the poor presentation.
Keywords: classifying feedback, reflection, constructive criticism
Key messages
- Destructive feedback has nothing to do with constructive criticism, but serves to belittle or promote the critic.
- The person who criticizes destructively is interchangeable. There will always be someone who acts that way.
- Calmness is the first and most important step: those who anticipate the situation can react confidently.
- Transparency about one’s own mistakes and experiences removes the basis for attack.
- The question “What does this have to do with the current situation?” brings the conversation back to the factual level.
- If the attack continues, a confident counter-offensive with concrete facts and counter-questions is legitimate.
- You learn from mistakes. Those who have failed before can often make better decisions.
- Even poorly packaged feedback can contain a grain of truth that should be reflected upon.
- It takes courage to prioritize one’s own happiness over the expectations of others, whether in one’s job, relationships, or as an entrepreneur.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is destructive feedback?
Destructive feedback is criticism that does not aim to help someone or improve a situation. Instead, it is intended to belittle the person in question, diminish their achievements, or morally elevate the critic above them.
How does destructive feedback differ from constructive feedback?
Constructive feedback is solution-oriented, respectful, and focuses on concrete opportunities for improvement. Destructive feedback, on the other hand, attacks the person, often refers to past mistakes, and contributes nothing to the current situation.
How can I best respond to destructive feedback?
Reza Mehman recommends a three-step strategy: First, remain calm and consider the person replaceable. Second, speak openly and transparently about your own story. Third, if necessary, launch a confident counter-offensive with concrete facts and counter-questions.
Why do people give destructive feedback?
The reasons are varied: Some want to feel morally superior to others, others try to diminish the achievements of others to make themselves look better. Often, such behavior stems from a desire to appear important or from insecurity.
Should I completely ignore destructive feedback?
Not necessarily. Even if the packaging is poor, there might be a grain of truth to it. It’s worthwhile to reflect calmly after the situation has passed and consider whether there’s a valid point behind the destructive criticism.
What do I do if destructive feedback is given in front of an audience?
Especially in public situations like meetings, it’s important to remain calm and not react emotionally. By being transparent about your own situation and asking a targeted question like, “What does that have to do with our current topic?”, you can regain control.
Is a counter-offensive appropriate in the face of destructive feedback?
Yes, but only as a third step, if composure and transparency are insufficient. The counter-offensive should be fact-based and confident, not emotional or equally destructive.
What example does Reza Mehman give for destructive feedback?
He refers to a scene on Markus Lanz’s show in which Ulrike Herrmann criticized Frank Thelen, saying it didn’t surprise her that he had gone bankrupt several times and that it was “really embarrassing.” He also shares a personal experience from a meeting in which his past startup experience was used against him.
Selected statements from Reza Mehman
“There is this one person, and this person is completely interchangeable, but this one person appears in my life at regular intervals and criticizes something I did at some point.”
“When you realize that this person is actually interchangeable in your mind, but that there simply has to be someone who criticizes you, then you approach the matter in a more relaxed way.”
“Play clearly and transparently, explaining why you think you can make better decisions today and what simply went wrong back then. That really takes the wind out of their sails.”
“Seriously, if someone tries to put me down, then ask them very specifically, ‘What did you actually do during that period, for example? Why do you think you’re better now?'”
“Of course, it’s also possible that you simply didn’t present the valuable message well at that moment. You can and should also consider whether there might actually be some truth to what the other person said.”
“If she then realizes that she is unhappy in the relationship and changes partners accordingly, then it is good that she is seeking her own happiness.”
“If you deal with it so transparently, you take the wind out of everyone’s sails and can then perhaps move on to a constructive part of the conversation.”
The full conversation
Hi everyone and welcome to a new episode of Project Mindset. In today’s episode, I want to talk about dealing with destructive feedback. We’ve discussed positive feedback and how to handle criticism in general in previous podcast episodes, but today’s episode focuses specifically on situations where someone is sitting across from you and criticizing something you’ve done, perhaps even years ago, in a truly destructive way, and how to deal with such people.
I saw a very interesting segment a few days ago on Markus Lanz’s show. There were several guests, including Frank Thelen, a technology investor, and Ulrike Herrmann, who, as I understand it, is an editor at a daily newspaper. The conversation started off quite simply and easily, and they talked about various topics. It was also clear that the guests had different opinions.
Then at some point, Frank Thelen said something that led to a complete escalation of the situation. I think it’s best if I read it aloud briefly because I think it’s a prime example of destructive feedback. Frank Thelen explained a bit about how inflation arises. I want to emphasize that I don’t want to go into the content of what he said, but only how the feedback was given. So, as I said, Frank Thelen gave his opinion on how inflation arises, and Ms. Herrmann then responded as follows.
A scene from a TV discussion
Let me read it aloud. She then said, no, that’s the wrong economic theory, that’s Milton Friedman, which has already been disproven. So far, so good. But now comes the problem. If you’re actually an entrepreneur and you’re investing based on a flawed monetary theory, then I see a problem. Honestly, quite seriously, it doesn’t surprise me that you’ve gone bankrupt several times. I have to say, that’s a rather aggressive way of putting it, and then it gets even more complicated.
If you don’t yet know where inflation comes from, that’s really embarrassing. That’s important for you as an investor. So, you could really tell at that moment that Frank Thelen was completely thrown off balance. He didn’t really know how to respond. I thought that feedback wasn’t very constructive at all. It didn’t contribute anything to the situation, I would say. Ms. Herrmann apparently wanted to belittle Frank Thelen’s competence in some way.
Similar situations in everyday life
And I have to say, I was really surprised that something like this was being said so openly on television. But I’ve noticed that my listeners and I have also experienced similar situations where someone has said something incredibly aggressive and offensive. You simply don’t know how to respond in that moment. In fact, a good friend of mine told me a while ago about a situation that, well, not exactly the same, but along those lines, where someone criticized her in a really unkind way, and she didn’t know how to react at first.
She was so stunned. I have my own special mindset strategy for that. You know, I’m always talking about my mindset tools. I have a particular mindset strategy for how I deal with such an attack, I’m deliberately putting it that way. A situation like that happened to me once. I remember it very well, actually. It was a while ago, but it went like this. I left my startup at the time. We decided not to continue in that format anymore.
Personal experiences after the startup
I have to say, it was really tough for me. It wasn’t a bankruptcy in the strictest sense, but we essentially decided to stop. I then left my own company and joined another one, where I actually got off to a pretty good start. Then, during a discussion with someone—it was a meeting, too—someone said, “Hey Reza, you didn’t really succeed with product development back then, in that format. Why do you think you’ll succeed with these products for us now?”
So, in front of everyone. And then I think to myself, yeah, this guy seems to want to make a bit of an aggressive move. He might also want to put himself above me morally. He wants to belittle my achievements, whether past or present, so that he, for example, is in a better position. And personally, I always have a kind of three-pronged approach to what I use, what I actually do. If someone criticizes me in that format or on that kind of stage, be it in a meeting, I would have recommended that Frank Thelen do the same.
Continued
I would react completely calmly. And my first thought was, ah, there’s that one person, and this person is completely interchangeable, but this one person who regularly appears in my life and criticizes something I’ve done at some point. Be it something good or something bad. And then, even with this mindset, you deal with the situation more calmly. Yes, of course, every few months, every few weeks, or once a year, or whatever, this one person comes along who has to criticize everything you’ve ever done.
Once you realize that, in your mind, this person is actually interchangeable, and that there simply has to be someone criticizing you, then you approach the situation more calmly. My next step is to always be completely transparent whenever such a situation arises. Even in Frank Thelen’s position, I would have said, “Yes, hey, this happened. I went bankrupt for these and those reasons. And this and that happened, it was all legal, legally sound.” So, what’s your point?
What does that have to do with today’s situation? Let’s look at my own case. I even said at the time, “Yes, that’s right, I made a few wrong decisions back then, and I’ve learned from them, and therefore I hope to be able to make better decisions now.” It’s about being completely open and transparent about why you think you can make better decisions now and what simply went wrong back then. That really takes the wind out of their sails, as they say.
Easing the situation with openness
The situation cools down a bit. Some people might continue, but most relax and realize, okay, hey, that was unnecessary stress I caused. And he’s right, you typically learn from your mistakes. If it does continue, then personally—this is my third step—I would launch a counterattack, a counter-offensive, so to speak, and ask really, really tough and direct counter-questions with confidence.
Or perhaps, if someone is already trying to morally superior to me or try to belittle my achievements, then I would, for example, ask at the Frank-T-Position, “Hey, yes, I had one, two, three bankruptcies.” I have no idea how many bankruptcies he had. We had X number of employees. Our payments included X amount in income tax, X in health insurance and X in pension contributions. Basic research was part of our work. We gained experience.
What exactly did you do during that time? Seriously, if someone tries to belittle your performance, reiterate what happened. And now tell me, what did you do during that time? And this woman, without having looked at her resume specifically, I don’t suspect she had as many employees as Frank Thelen, or that she paid as much tax over such a long period. That’s just my assumption. And I’d hate to make such a comparison, but when someone tries to give feedback in such an aggressive and, well, unconstructive way, then in my view, you have to push back a bit.
Consciously apply the three steps
And when you go through these three steps, really thinking, “Ah yes, there’s this one person who appears in my life at regular intervals—and this person is interchangeable—and criticizes something,” then I’m prepared. Then I know, “Ah yes, there’s that person again.” The second step is to speak transparently about what happened and also say, “Hey, what does this have to do with the current situation, for example?” And, for instance, “I might be able to make better decisions because I’ve already made a wrong decision once.”
And the third point is, really, counter-offensive states, if someone tries to belittle me, then ask very specifically, “Yes, what did you actually do during that period, for example? Why do you think you’re better now?” It doesn’t even have to be on a business level. For example, I can tell you about an acquaintance of mine, as I mentioned earlier, who was accused of not being able to maintain a long-term relationship and of constantly having new partners.
Explain decisions openly
Then I think to myself, so what? If she realizes she’s unhappy in the relationship and changes partners accordingly, then it’s a good thing that she’s seeking her own happiness. Or a friend of mine was accused, in a conversation, of not being able to commit to his job. He changes jobs regularly. And then I think to myself, so what? He’s just not like many other people who are totally unhappy in their jobs and still do them day in and day out; he’s simply not ready to be unhappy.
Continued
And if he realizes the job doesn’t fulfill him, he simply changes jobs. This applies to any area of life. And I think if you’re transparent about mistakes—what do you mean by mistakes?—if you’re transparent about the situations, about how and why things happen, and why do you think they did? Why do you even allow yourself to talk about it? That’s a valid question. If you’re that transparent, you take the wind out of everyone’s sails and can then perhaps move on to a more constructive part of the conversation.
Check even poorly packaged feedback
Okay everyone, it was important to me today to talk about truly unconstructive feedback. In many past podcast episodes, we’ve discussed feedback in general. I’m always very open to feedback. I see every single piece of feedback I receive as a golden nugget. Perhaps that’s also the right attitude when it comes to today’s topic. Of course, it’s also possible that you simply didn’t present the valuable point well at the time. You can and should also consider whether there might actually be some truth to what the other person said.
So, feedback, even if it doesn’t initially come across as constructive, might contain a grain of truth. But for me, it was important today to talk about a case where someone just blurted out whatever came to mind, simply to avoid contributing constructively to any kind of discussion. So, I hope you enjoyed today’s podcast episode. If so, please give it a like and subscribe to the channel, because that’s the only way Project Mindset can continue to grow.
Thank you for listening and see you next time. Don’t forget, until then, mindset is everything.
This transcript was automatically generated using Whisper AI and may contain occasional errors.
Keywords
Tags: destructive feedback, constructive criticism, mindset strategy, dealing with criticism, composure, self-confidence, counter-offensive, feedback culture, project mindset, Reza Mehman, unfair criticism, culture of learning from mistakes, transparency, emotional control, Frank Thelen, Markus Lanz
Names and terms
Reza Mehman, Project Mindset, Frank Thelen, Ulrike Herrmann, Markus Lanz, Milton Friedman, Destructive feedback, Constructive criticism, Three-step strategy, Counter-offensive, Mindset tool, Startup, Product development, Feedback culture, Inflation, Monetary theory, Culture of learning from mistakes
quotable passage
Destructive feedback is not aimed at improvement, but at put-downs.
The person who criticizes in this way is interchangeable in the mind, because there will always be someone else who takes on this role.
Those who remain calm, speak transparently about their own experiences, and confidently ask counter-questions when necessary, regain control of the conversation.
The crucial point is: Even poorly packaged feedback can contain a grain of truth worth reflecting on.
You can find more personal thoughts on dealing with challenges at Project Mindset.


